Three platforms. Three different questions.
Paste one link and we read what is already public. Each audit has its own benchmarks and its own score, because the platforms measure different things — a strong Spotify number tells you nothing about whether anyone is passing your tracks on. Free, no signup to see the result, and the 30-day plan at the end is never paywalled.
A name with no link runs the Spotify audit. Paste a link and we take the platform from it.
The same artist, read on all three. Noise resolves into signal as each audit finishes — and one platform comes back strong while the other two come back mixed. That is the point of running all three.
This is what comes back.
Thomas Deil ran all three. Switch between them and watch how differently the same artist reads on each platform — three scores, three verdicts, three sets of benchmarks.
Reach and conversion both sit where they should for this size. Last.fm's 30,763 scrobbles confirm these are real listeners rather than inflated numbers. There is no structural problem to fix here, so the next move is putting spend behind what already converts.
Genuine reach. The question is what happens to these listeners after they arrive.
2.6% of listeners follow — inside the 2.5–8% typical for artists this size.
Spotify's own index of how much a catalogue is played right now. Comfortably in recommendation range.
Inside Release Radar's 28-day window, so followers are still being shown this.
The report continues
Below this line: the cross-platform read against Last.fm and Deezer, what the numbers say about conversion, and the 30-day plan week by week with a free way to do every move.
That report is Thomas Deil's, not yours. Nothing above is held back behind an email — the gate comes after your own report is on screen.
Looking for the full campaign menu instead? See packages.